Anyone can make an official complaint.ricard60 wrote:No i mean that the world chess championship can not only depend on if somebody else raise or not an issue. Suppose Fabian did not raised the issue, there must be another rules that had discovered rybka or any other program from cheating.
Rybka disqualified and banned from WCCC
Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Steve B, Watchman
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the fen tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the fen tag before the upgrade.
- Harvey Williamson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 am
- Location: Media City, UK
- Contact:
What i mean is that if nobody makes an official complaint a cheating software can go on and on playing the world chess champinship. So there must be another type of rules and not just sit and wait until somebody makes an official complaint.Harvey Williamson wrote:Anyone can make an official complaint.ricard60 wrote:No i mean that the world chess championship can not only depend on if somebody else raise or not an issue. Suppose Fabian did not raised the issue, there must be another rules that had discovered rybka or any other program from cheating.
- Harvey Williamson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 am
- Location: Media City, UK
- Contact:
You can not expect volunteers to spend weeks looking at every engine so there has to be a way to decide which to look at.ricard60 wrote:What i mean is that if nobody makes an official complaint a cheating software can go on and on playing the world chess champinship. So there must be another type of rules and not just sit and wait until somebody makes an official complaint.Harvey Williamson wrote:Anyone can make an official complaint.ricard60 wrote:No i mean that the world chess championship can not only depend on if somebody else raise or not an issue. Suppose Fabian did not raised the issue, there must be another rules that had discovered rybka or any other program from cheating.
The way to decide wich to look at is what the organizers of the world chess championship must come up with.Harvey Williamson wrote:You can not expect volunteers to spend weeks looking at every engine so there has to be a way to decide which to look at.ricard60 wrote:What i mean is that if nobody makes an official complaint a cheating software can go on and on playing the world chess champinship. So there must be another type of rules and not just sit and wait until somebody makes an official complaint.Harvey Williamson wrote:Anyone can make an official complaint.ricard60 wrote:No i mean that the world chess championship can not only depend on if somebody else raise or not an issue. Suppose Fabian did not raised the issue, there must be another rules that had discovered rybka or any other program from cheating.
- Harvey Williamson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 am
- Location: Media City, UK
- Contact:
- Bryan Whitby
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:57 pm
- Location: England
Yes thanks Harvey for that.
Well having watched all of it, a few things stand out in my eyes,
1) Vas must have been living on another planet for the last 6-12months, he didn't even know it was Fabien who complained against him and seemed unaware of a few other points Nelson made.
2) When asked what did he make of being called a cheat, he replied;...." i dont care anymore, i did at first but now talking about it is just like talking about the weather."
It was the last point that really made me dislike him more than i did already. His answers to a lot of Nelson's questions were really a load of drivel with no real substance. I don't know what others on here think, but its worth a look.
Well having watched all of it, a few things stand out in my eyes,
1) Vas must have been living on another planet for the last 6-12months, he didn't even know it was Fabien who complained against him and seemed unaware of a few other points Nelson made.
2) When asked what did he make of being called a cheat, he replied;...." i dont care anymore, i did at first but now talking about it is just like talking about the weather."
It was the last point that really made me dislike him more than i did already. His answers to a lot of Nelson's questions were really a load of drivel with no real substance. I don't know what others on here think, but its worth a look.
- Harvey Williamson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:57 am
- Location: Media City, UK
- Contact:
- Terry McCracken
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:49 pm
Fish Guts
That will put a real nail/spike/stake in the Rybka/Fruit coffin if the FSF drives it home. I hope they do. Let's put this Frankenstein Monstrosity to bed.Harvey Williamson wrote:An interesting development:
"License Compliance Engineer, Free Software Foundation (to Fabien)"]I reviewed the analysis of the similarities between Fruit and Rybka, and found it pretty compelling. I think this is something that we could absolutely pursue as a compliance case."
Terry McCracken