It's positions like this that make me think Hiarcs can over take Rybka. I think Hiarcs has better understanding of inbalances. Either that or Rybka needs better tuning.
[fen]r3r3/2n2p1k/3p2pb/Rp1P3p/1P1NP3/Q2p1P2/3q1BPP/1R3K2 b - - 0 1[/fen]
Analysis by HIARCS 11.2 SP:
1...Nxd5 2.Qb2 Qxb2 3.Rxb2 d2 4.Rxd2 Bxd2 5.exd5 Bxb4 6.Rxa8 Rxa8 7.Nxb5 Ra1+ 8.Ke2 Ra5 9.Nc7 Bc5 10.Bg3 Ra2+ 11.Kf1 f5
-+ (-2.48 ) Depth: 13/30 00:05:03 71112kN
Analysis by Rybka 2.3.2a mp 32-bit :
1...Rxa5 2.bxa5 Nxd5 3.exd5 Re2 4.Bg1 Be3 5.Qb2 Rxg2 6.Bxe3 Qxb2 7.Rxb2 Rxb2 8.a6
=/+ (-0.47) Depth: 20 00:07:04 15369kN
Positions like this
Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Steve B, Watchman
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the fen tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the fen tag before the upgrade.
-
Ted Summers
- Member
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:20 pm
- Location: Marietta, GA
- Contact:
If only it were that simple...........Fritz 5.32 selects Nxd5 in only 32 seconds on my FX60, though it's true it didn't get to the full line even after 3mins 
I'm not sure if this is just a tactical combination rather then an understanding of inbalances?
Certainly Rybka isn't the sharpest tool in the box with regards tactics, whereas Hiarcs will normally find the merest sniff of a chance to wipe opponents from the board!
I'm not sure if this is just a tactical combination rather then an understanding of inbalances?
Certainly Rybka isn't the sharpest tool in the box with regards tactics, whereas Hiarcs will normally find the merest sniff of a chance to wipe opponents from the board!