Suggestion/Question RE: HCE Blunder Analysis

Get your specific HIARCS/Junior support questions answered here as well as up-to-the-minute news!

Moderators: Watchman, Mark Uniacke, mrudolf

Post Reply
EloDeficit
Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:04 pm

Suggestion/Question RE: HCE Blunder Analysis

Post by EloDeficit »

Current game/blunder analysis inserts an alternative line of play when a blunder or error is detected.

Is there a way to have HIARCS continue the blunder line of play and show what the best line(s) of play against the mistake would be?

Especially when playing against a handicapped engine or human players, the mistakes that are detected by the anlysis are not fully exploited. Therefore having the analysis engine show the best line of play against the blunder/error would be useful.

Ideally, these variations would appear in a different color, e.g. red instead of blue.

It would also be very useful to analyze a batch of games.

Thanks for your attention!
EloDeficit
Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:04 pm

Solution

Post by EloDeficit »

Actually a solution is already available...

Instead of analyzing "Blunders" for one side, analyze "Blunders and inaccuracies" for both sides.

However, it would still be nice if game analysis allowed setting thresholds for what would be considered a blunder, inaccuracy, etc.
Post Reply