Hiarcs 11.2 not a good start?

This forum is for general discussions and questions, including Collectors Corner and anything to do with Computer chess.

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, Steve B, Watchman

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the fen tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
checkpoint
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:19 am

Hiarcs 11.2 not a good start?

Post by checkpoint »

Hello...great site here...
:)
I played a couple of games with new Hiarcs in 16 min games on playchess and well, it didn't go well for Hiarcs...my pc is AMD 64X2 4200, and 512 hash...the first game was unbalanced because of the opponent's 8 threads...but the next one was almost balanced...bn

[Event "Rated game, 16m + 0s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2007.07.28"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Checkpoint, HIARCS 11.2 MP."]
[Black "RudiSinnlos, Rybka 2.3.2a mp"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C04"]
[WhiteElo "2405"]
[BlackElo "2651"]
[Annotator "0.55;??"]
[PlyCount "104"]
[EventDate "2007.07.28"]
[TimeControl "960"]

{Rybka 2.3.2a mp: 20.7 ply; 626kN/s Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5365 @ 3.
00GHz 2993MHz, (8 threads)} 1. e4 {0.01/1 0} Nc6 {0} 2. Nf3 {0.01/1 0} e6 {0}
3. d4 {0.01/1 0} d5 {0} 4. Nbd2 {0.01/1 0} Nf6 {0} 5. e5 {0.01/1 0} Nd7 {0} 6.
Nb3 {0.01/1 0} a5 {0} 7. a4 {0.01/1 0} Be7 {0} 8. Bb5 {0.55/15 37} Na7 {
(Ncb8) 0} 9. Bd3 {0.01/1 0} b6 {0} 10. O-O {0.32/15 52} c5 {(Nc6) 0} 11. c4 {
0.35/15 42} O-O {(Bb7) 0} 12. cxd5 {1.05/14 29} exd5 {7} 13. Qc2 {0.73/14 33}
h6 {24} 14. Bd2 {0.61/13 0} Nc6 {10} 15. Bf5 {0.59/13 19} c4 {60} 16. Nc1 {
0.44/14 0} Nb4 {(Bb4) 22} 17. Bxb4 {0.43/14 29} axb4 {(Bxb4) 5} 18. Ne2 {
0.20/14 45} b3 {(Nb8) 12} 19. Qb1 {0.39/14 30} Nb8 {23} 20. Nf4 {0.14/14 0} Nc6
{(Bxf5) 27} 21. Bxc8 {0.25/14 25} Rxc8 {34} 22. Qf5 {0.03/15 0} Nb4 {(Ra8) 78}
23. e6 {0.27/13 31} Bd6 {6} 24. Rae1 {0.21/13 17} Ra8 {15} 25. Kh1 {0.34/13 0}
Qf6 {(Ra5) 12} 26. Qxf6 {-0.18/15 22} gxf6 {3} 27. Nh5 {-0.78/17 60} Be7 {40}
28. Nh4 {-0.38/16 19} Nd3 {67} 29. Nf5 {-0.42/16 0} fxe6 {(Ra7) 17} 30. Rxe6 {
-0.25/15 18} Bd8 {76} 31. Rd6 {-0.85/14 0} c3 {(Nxb2) 11} 32. bxc3 {-0.31/14 52
} b2 {(Rxa4) 12} 33. Rxd5 {-0.76/14 20} Rxa4 {0} 34. Nhg3 {-1.85/16 63} Ra1 {6}
35. Rb5 {-2.54/16 46} Re8 {0} 36. Ne3 {-2.64/15 15} f5 {1} 37. Nexf5 {
-2.86/15 31} Rxf1+ {(Ree1) 2} 38. Nxf1 {-2.90/15 1} Re1 {2} 39. Kg1 {-2.91/15 7
} Kh7 {10} 40. N5e3 {-3.15/16 17} b1=Q {3} 41. Rxb1 {-3.29/16 0} Rxb1 {2} 42.
Nd5 {-3.52/15 5} b5 {9} 43. g3 {-4.12/17 9} Rc1 {6} 44. Kg2 {-4.35/17 7} Rc2 {8
} 45. Nfe3 {-4.44/16 0} Rxf2+ {17} 46. Kh3 {-4.66/16 0} Bg5 {(Re2) 3} 47. Ng4 {
-5.53/15 6} Rc2 {7} 48. Ne5 {-5.67/15 0} Nxe5 {6} 49. dxe5 {-6.46/17 10} Re2 {1
} 50. e6 {-6.54/17 15} Rxe6 {0} 51. Kg2 {-6.63/16 7} Re5 {9} 52. Nb4 {
-6.71/16 0} Bd2 {
(Re2+) Checkpoint,HIARCS 11.2 MP resigns (Lag: Av=0.27s, max=1.7s) 8} 0-1




[Event "Rated game, 16m + 0s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2007.07.28"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Checkpoint, HIARCS 11.2 MP."]
[Black "Tondern12, Rybka 2.3.2a mp"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A17"]
[WhiteElo "2399"]
[BlackElo "2566"]
[Annotator "0.12;0.18"]
[PlyCount "135"]
[EventDate "2007.07.28"]
[TimeControl "960"]

{Rybka 2.3.2a mp: 19.8 ply; 215kN/s AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor
4600+ 2592MHz, (2 threads) Rybka 2.3.2a mp: 19.8 ply; 215kN/s AMD Athlon(tm)
64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ 2592MHz, (2 threads)} 1. c4 {0.01/1 0} Nf6 {0}
2. Nc3 {0.01/1 0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0.01/1 0} Bb4 {0} 4. Qc2 {0.01/1 0} O-O {0} 5.
a3 {0.01/1 0} Bxc3 {0} 6. Qxc3 {0.01/1 0} b6 {0} 7. b4 {0.01/1 0} Bb7 {0} 8.
Bb2 {0.01/1 0} d6 {0} 9. e3 {0.01/1 0} Nbd7 {0} 10. Be2 {0.12/15 39} c5 {0} 11.
O-O {0.10/14 25} Qe7 {0} 12. d3 {0.12/14 38} Rfc8 {0} 13. Rfe1 {0.19/13 36} e5
{0.18/13 26} 14. e4 {(b5) 0.19/13 0} a6 {0.20/14 34} 15. Nh4 {(Db3) 0.51/14 32}
g6 {(Qf8) 0.10/15 25} 16. Qd2 {(Sf3) 0.63/13 30} b5 {(Nh5) 0.11/13 7} 17. Rad1
{(Dg5) 0.64/12 18} bxc4 {(Qd8) -0.42/15 20} 18. dxc4 {(Dg5) 0.14/14 60} Nxe4 {
-0.52/15 7} 19. Qh6 {0.04/14 0} Nb6 {(cxb4) -0.55/15 11} 20. f3 {
(Tc1) 0.18/14 39} Na4 {-0.60/14 6} 21. fxe4 {0.00/15 19} Nxb2 {-0.75/16 2} 22.
Rb1 {-0.31/15 51} Na4 {-0.82/17 17} 23. Rb3 {(Lg4) -0.91/15 52} Qf8 {
-0.92/16 18} 24. Qxf8+ {-1.14/15 38} Kxf8 {(Rxf8) -0.89/18 2} 25. Nf3 {
-1.02/14 27} Bxe4 {-0.76/17 14} 26. Ng5 {-0.99/15 0} Bf5 {(Bc6) -0.87/17 29}
27. g4 {-0.98/14 23} Be6 {-0.89/17 6} 28. Nxh7+ {-1.14/13 17} Ke7 {-0.98/18 56}
29. Ng5 {-1.26/15 0} Bd7 {(f5) -1.07/17 78} 30. Rd1 {-1.22/13 22} cxb4 {
(Rab8) -1.03/16 7} 31. axb4 {-1.32/14 25} Rab8 {-1.02/17 1} 32. Rdb1 {
(Se4) -1.47/14 21} f6 {-1.12/14 5} 33. Ne4 {-1.69/14 12} Be6 {-1.28/17 14} 34.
g5 {(Sd2) -1.70/14 0} fxg5 {(f5) -1.50/15 5} 35. Ra3 {-1.91/14 19} Bf5 {
-1.52/18 1} 36. Rxa4 {-1.89/14 11} Bxe4 {-1.57/19 20} 37. Rb2 {-2.03/15 0} Rb6
{-1.54/18 19} 38. Ra3 {(Tba2) -2.07/15 0} Bf5 {-1.65/13 4} 39. Kf2 {
(Kg2) -2.13/13 4} Rh8 {-1.90/18 18} 40. Kg2 {(Kg1) -2.14/14 0} Rhb8 {
(Be6) -1.90/16 5} 41. Rab3 {-2.17/13 8} Be6 {-1.98/17 14} 42. Kg3 {
(Kf2) -2.21/14 0} Rh8 {-1.92/17 21} 43. Kg2 {-2.28/15 0} Rh4 {(Rc8) -2.05/16 3}
44. Rc3 {-2.27/13 10} Rb8 {(Kf6) -1.90/17 6} 45. Kg1 {-2.21/13 12} Rbh8 {
(a5) -1.86/17 15} 46. Bf1 {-2.08/13 10} Rg4+ {-1.92/17 3} 47. Rg3 {-2.30/15 8}
Rxg3+ {-1.93/17 3} 48. hxg3 {-2.31/16 0} Rb8 {(Rc8) -1.95/18 13} 49. Kf2 {
-2.29/16 16} Rf8+ {-1.94/18 4} 50. Kg2 {-2.38/16 14} g4 {(Rc8) -2.15/19 57} 51.
Bd3 {(Le2) -2.29/14 8} Rc8 {(Rf3) -2.17/17 13} 52. c5 {-2.41/14 9} dxc5 {
-2.21/18 5} 53. bxc5 {-2.39/14 0} Rxc5 {-2.21/19 16} 54. Bxa6 {-2.55/14 0} e4 {
-2.26/19 5} 55. Re2 {(Tb4) -2.46/14 0} Kd6 {-2.33/18 3} 56. Bb7 {
(Kf2) -2.55/15 8} Bd5 {-2.75/20 3} 57. Bxd5 {-2.89/15 5} Kxd5 {-2.62/24 1} 58.
Rd2+ {-2.90/15 6} Ke5 {-2.62/26 9} 59. Kf2 {-2.90/16 0} Rc3 {-3.49/24 11} 60.
Ra2 {-2.91/16 0} Rf3+ {-3.59/23 1} 61. Kg2 {-3.67/17 30} e3 {-4.04/28 0} 62.
Ra5+ {-3.67/16 6} Kd4 {-4.23/28 6} 63. Ra4+ {-4.22/17 19} Kd3 {(Kc3) -4.23/29 0
} 64. Ra3+ {-4.47/16 9} Kc2 {-4.79/29 1} 65. Ra2+ {-4.47/16 3} Kb1 {
(Kb3) -4.79/29 11} 66. Ra6 {-4.97/17 16} Rf2+ {-5.12/27 18} 67. Kg1 {-5.43/18 0
} Kc2 {-5.12/26 7} 68. Ra3 {
Checkpoint,HIARCS 11.2 MP resigns (Lag: Av=0.46s, max=11.5s) -6.67/16 11} 0-1
André van Ark
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:07 pm

Hiarcs 11.2 not a good start?

Post by André van Ark »

Hi,

Hiarcs 11.2 plays very strong here! My score sofar = > 50% on 16+0 level. +10 =21 -9

Below you find a nice attacking game 8)

Cheers!

André

Btw. Used Hardware: Q6600 @2,9 Ghz. 512MB hash

[Event "Partij met rating, 16m + 0s"]
[Site "Computers toegestaan"]
[Date "2007.07.30"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Max damage, HIARCS 11.2 MP UCI."]
[Black "Takker, Rybka 2.3.2a mp"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A40"]
[WhiteElo "2358"]
[BlackElo "2605"]
[PlyCount "245"]
[EventDate "2007.07.31"]

1. d4 c5 2. d5 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 Qa5 5. Bd2 Nf6 6. e4 O-O 7. Nf3 Qb6 8. Bd3
d6 9. O-O Ng4 10. Rb1 Ne5 11. Nxe5 Bxe5 12. Bg5 Re8 13. f4 Bd4+ 14. Kh1 Nd7 15.
Qe1 a6 16. Qh4 Bg7 17. Be2 Bd4 18. f5 Nf6 19. Bd2 Rb8 20. Rf3 Qa5 21. g4 Kh8
22. Rbf1 Rg8 23. g5 Nd7 24. e5 Nxe5 25. Rh3 Rg7 26. f6 Bxh3 27. fxg7+ Kxg7 28.
Qxh3 Kg8 29. Qh6 b5 30. Ne4 Qd8 31. cxb5 axb5 32. Bc1 Nd7 33. Qh3 Ne5 34. a3
Qa5 35. Qh6 Nd7 36. Bg4 Bg7 37. Qh3 Ne5 38. Be2 Qa8 39. Qb3 c4 40. Qd1 b4 41.
a4 Qa5 42. Be3 Rc8 43. Kg2 Ra8 44. b3 c3 45. Bb5 Rf8 46. h3 Qa8 47. Bf4 Rc8 48.
Bc1 c2 49. Qd2 Rc7 50. Re1 Rc8 51. Re2 Qb7 52. Rf2 Qa8 53. Kf1 Bh8 54. Kg1 Rc7
55. Be2 Rc8 56. Kh2 Bg7 57. Kg2 Qa5 58. Kg1 Qb6 59. Kf1 Qa5 60. Kg2 Qa8 61. Kh2
Rc7 62. Kg1 Nd7 63. Kg2 Nb6 64. Qd3 Nd7 65. Bf1 Ne5 66. Qd2 Rc8 67. Kh2 Qa5 68.
Bb5 Qb6 69. Kg2 Qb7 70. Kf1 Qa8 71. h4 Qa5 72. Kg2 Rc7 73. Re2 Qa8 74. Re1 Rc8
75. Rf1 Rc7 76. Be2 h5 77. Rf2 Qa5 78. Rf1 Qa8 79. Rf4 Qa5 80. Bb5 Qa8 81. Bf1
Qa5 82. Be2 Rc8 83. Rf1 Rc7 84. Ba3 Qb6 85. a5 Qxa5 86. Bc1 Rc8 87. Rf2 Ng4 88.
Rf1 Be5 89. Kh1 Qb6 90. Kg2 Kg7 91. Bxg4 hxg4 92. h5 Qb5 93. h6+ Kg8 94. Rg1
Qa6 95. Rh1 f5 96. gxf6 exf6 97. h7+ Kh8 98. Rh6 g5 99. Rxf6 Bxf6 100. Nxf6 Qa7
101. Ne4 Qe7 102. Nxg5 Qf6 103. Qe2 g3 104. Kxg3 Qd4 105. Qe6 Rf8 106. Kh3 Qd3+
107. Kh4 Qd4+ 108. Kh5 Qg7 109. Qxd6 Rf6 110. Qb8+ Rf8 111. Qxb4 Rf5 112. Qb8+
Rf8 113. Qg3 Rf1 114. Bb2 Rh1+ 115. Kg4 Qxb2 116. Qb8+ Kg7 117. Ne6+ Kxh7 118.
Ng5+ Kg7 119. Qc7+ Kh8 120. Qd8+ Kg7 121. Qe7+ Kg8 122. Qf7+ Kh8 123. Qf8# 1-0
checkpoint
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:19 am

Re: Hiarcs 11.2 not a good start?

Post by checkpoint »

André van Ark wrote:Hi,

Hiarcs 11.2 plays very strong here! My score sofar = > 50% on 16+0 level. +10 =21 -9

Below you find a nice attacking game 8)

Cheers!

André

Btw. Used Hardware: Q6600 @2,9 Ghz. 512MB hash

Thanks Andre...Good to know that...possibly my pc is not good enough for playchess...Tonight i used one of my old set up and in fact I won in this time frame as well but when back to default I got one draw and two lost...so it is early but I put my set up here for checking:

11.2 Mp version
hypermodern off
forward pruning 9
threat depth 4
others default

very close to default as you see ... generally the engine takes a little more time to move but not with significant difference from default based on marathon test...so let's see... :? bn
User avatar
Sebastian Boehme
Member
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:59 am
Location: Bernburg (Germany)
Contact:

Post by Sebastian Boehme »

Time to refresh this thread a bit with one of my latest blitz wins on server:

[Event "3m + 0s, rated"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2007.08.08"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Striker Freedom, Rybka 2.3.2a mp"]
[Black "Solidius, HIARCS 11.2 MP."]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2851"]
[BlackElo "2584"]
[PlyCount "150"]
[EventDate "2007.08.08"]
[EventType "blitz"]

1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5.
Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. Be3 {0} e6 {0} 7. f3 {0} b5 {0} 8. Qd2 {0} Nbd7 {0} 9. O-O-O
{0} Bb7 {0} 10. a3 {0} d5 {0.33/13 21} 11. g4 {0.32/13 7} e5 {-0.74/12 8} 12.
exd5 {0.18/14 9} exd4 {-1.00/12 6} 13. Bxd4 {0.12/15 1} Bd6 {-0.59/12 18} 14.
Re1+ {-0.10/16 12} Kf8 {-1.01/12 5} 15. g5 {-0.21/15 1} Nh5 {-1.03/11 3} 16.
Rg1 {-0.24/14 8} Qc7 {-1.20/10 5} 17. Be3 {-0.28/14 20} Kg8 {-1.30/10 5} 18.
Kb1 {-0.20/11 2} Re8 {-1.26/10 3} 19. Ne4 {-0.06/12 4} Re5 {-0.53/11 23} 20.
Bd4 {-0.09/13 2} Rxd5 {-1.53/9 2} 21. Nf6+ {0.08/13 2} Ndxf6 {0.33/12 0} 22.
gxf6 {0.00/14 0} g6 {0.20/11 2} 23. c4 {0.08/15 6} Rxd4 {-0.05/10 8} 24. Qxd4 {
0.05/17 4} h6 {-0.60/10 3} 25. cxb5 {0.05/16 13} axb5 {-0.24/11 0} 26. Rg2 {
-0.20/16 12} Kh7 {-0.78/9 3} 27. Rc2 {-0.17/16 2} Qb8 {-0.92/9 1} 28. Bxb5 {
-0.13/15 0} Rd8 {-0.78/9 2} 29. Qc4 {-0.11/15 3} Kg8 {-0.83/10 1} 30. Re7 {
-0.21/14 1} Rf8 {-0.84/10 0} 31. Rg2 {-0.38/13 3} Nf4 {-1.26/10 2} 32. Rd2 {
-0.41/14 3} Bxf3 {-0.80/10 0} 33. Bc6 {-0.42/13 1} Bg4 {-1.09/10 0} 34. Rb7 {
-0.28/10 0} Qd8 {-1.00/10 2} 35. Qd4 {-0.43/14 1} Bc7 {-1.28/10 1} 36. Qc3 {
-0.68/14 3} Bf5+ {-1.60/11 0} 37. Ka1 {-0.91/15 4} Qc8 {-1.50/12 0} 38. Rd1 {
-0.90/14 6} Nh5 {-1.80/12 0} 39. Bf3 {-0.60/12 1} Bxh2 {-2.03/11 2} 40. Qd4 {
-1.02/14 5} Bb8 {-2.10/12 0} 41. a4 {-0.76/11 1} Nf4 {-2.35/10 2} 42. a5 {
-1.33/13 0} Ne6 {-2.64/10 2} 43. Qd2 {-1.62/13 2} Bf4 {-2.91/11 3} 44. Qc3 {
-1.84/13 1} Qxc3 {-2.82/11 1} 45. bxc3 {-1.79/17 2} Ra8 {-2.83/11 0} 46. Rb5 {
-1.97/16 1} Ra7 {-3.06/10 0} 47. Kb2 {-1.89/15 0} Bc7 {-3.00/11 1} 48. Ra1 {
-1.97/15 0} Bd3 {-3.05/11 0} 49. Rb7 {-2.08/14 0} Rxa5 {-3.09/12 1} 50. Rxa5 {
-2.21/15 1} Bxa5 {-3.24/14 0} 51. Rb8+ {-2.21/15 0} Nf8 {-3.24/13 0} 52. Ra8 {
-2.20/15 0} Bb6 {-3.47/13 2} 53. Kb3 {-2.40/16 2} h5 {-3.49/12 1} 54. c4 {
-2.51/16 0} Bf5 {-3.53/12 1} 55. Kb4 {-2.53/14 1} Bd4 {-3.85/13 0} 56. c5 {
-2.14/14 0} Bxf6 {-3.94/12 0} 57. c6 {-2.35/14 1} Be5 {-4.19/12 0} 58. Re8 {
-2.92/14 1} Bc7 {-4.50/13 0} 59. Be4 {-3.40/15 1} Bxe4 {-5.23/14 1} 60. Rxe4 {
-4.04/20 0} g5 {-5.25/14 0} 61. Re1 {-4.11/19 2} h4 {-5.42/14 0} 62. Re3 {
-4.68/16 2} g4 {-7.47/11 1} 63. Re7 {-5.12/9 1} g3 {-9.89/11 1} 64. Kb5 {
-7.76/8 1} h3 {-12.25/11 1} 65. Re1 {-7.28/5 0} h2 {-18.26/11 1} 66. Re4 {
-14.76/5 0} h1=Q {-22.52/10 1} 67. Rg4+ {-18.87/7 0} Ng6 {-28.51/9 1} 68. Kb4 {
-25.48/6 0} Bd6+ {-30.61/7 1} 69. Kb5 {-#12/5 1} Qd5+ {-#7/10 1} 70. Ka6 {
-28.48/6 0} Qa2+ {-#6/10 0} 71. Kb5 {-18.81/4 0} Qb3+ {-#5/9 0} 72. Ka6 {
-#4/3 0} Bc7 {-#4/7 0} 73. Rb4 {-#3/3 0} Qxb4 {-#3/5 0} 74. Ka7 {-#2/3 0} Ne5 {
-#2/3 0} 75. Ka6 {-#1/3 0} Qb6# {(Lag: Av=0.32s, max=0.6s) -#1/1 0} 0-1

This guy had a quad, Rybka and 64 bit --- vs. my humble 32 bit Intel Centrino Duo T2500 - opening books ended at move 10

Just enjoy this Hiarcs playing style, which is one great example that Rybka is definitely beatable.

Though I do not want to disguise that it was 3+0. But wins like these are nice aren't they? :wink:

Regards,
Sebastian
wayne lowrance
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:37 am

enjoy the moment guys

Post by wayne lowrance »

We will see as time goes by... :)
Post Reply